Many of us believe the candidates for this years elections are not presidential material, but like the article “Hillary Clinton for president” from The Washington Post says, “Hillary has the potential to be a good president and not just because her opponent is dreadful” She is more knowledgable, prepared, and she is just our best option.  In this article the author is convinced that every voter should vote even if they don't think neither of the candidates are adequate. The article is persuading the voters to vote for Hillary. The author has bias towards Hillary, but provides negative facts of both candidates. The article mentions things Clinton has done wrong, but it also mentions things she has done right. For example it's mentioned that, “As first lady, she failed when she tried to radically remake the American health-care system. Instead of retreating, she reentered the fray to help enact a more modest but important reform expanding health-care access to poor children.” So, I agree with the opinion of this author, I consider that none of the candidates are perfect, but Hillary is more prepared, has more experience in political issues, and her reputation is far better than Donald Trump’s. Nothing changes the fact that his is one of the most ridiculous election of all times. Donald Trump should have dropped from the elections after the multiple racist offenses he made against Mexicans,Muslims and specially women. It would just be shameful to have him as president of one of the most prestigious Nations. Hillary has done suspicious thing and have been accused of many others. However, there is no poof of many things that are being said about her, so why not vote for her?  Donald Trump would be a far worst president, even compared to Mexico’s who has done nothing to make his county progress. At least he doesn't have a reputation of making any form of disrespectful comments towards people. Trump on the other hand  would not only be a bad image to our county for the way he speaks, but knowing how he acts, he could easily damage our county for good. 

"How much damage could a president trump do?

Once again, one of many journalists from the Washington post has written about how Donald Trump would be a disaster if he were to be elected president. The title of the article is, "How much damage could a president trump do? We can only begin to imagen." The title itself resumes the entire point of the article; which is intended for all the voters; specially, those who have considered voting for trump. The authors main argument is about the cons of having trump as a president it states that "[trump]could, in fact, unilaterally order mass deportation, resume torturing detainees, undue the preservation of of natural treasures and tear up long standing trade arguments."(Editorial Board) The reason for believing this is the fact that it is long known that "Trump quickens to take offense, has lack of impulse control, so it is natural to focus on the most extreme possibilities."(Editorial Board) He would be a disaster as president. The authors name is not specified, but all his statements and assumptions of what could happen if trump is president are accurate and reliable. If this article was indeed to persuade voters to see reality and vote for Hillary Clinton, I agree. I agree with the opinion of the author of this article and so does the majority of Americans. Donald Trump as president is the worst thing that can happen to this country. Although many people believe neither Trump or Hillary are president material; Hillary is much more prepared for the role as president. She  is way more responsible, respectful and knowledgeable.